Guest Sign UpLoginNew PostSections ₦0What's Up?DownloadsShopChatToolsAdvertise
Join the Publishers' Program. Get paid for writing.
Recharge DSTV, GOTV, StarTimes, & PREPAID METERS on

Mr A

Example 1: The Voting Age Should be Lowered to 16

When discussing the idea of lowering the voting age to 16, it is important to understand and consider the reasons behind implementing such a change. The proponents of the motion argue that:

1. Engaging young voters: 16-year-olds are already involved in various aspects of society and the economy, such as working and paying taxes. It is only fair to allow them the opportunity to have their voices heard and participate in the democratic process.

2. Enhancing civic education: By lowering the voting age, we can inspire and empower young people to take a more active role in the political landscape. This will ultimately lead to a more informed, active, and engaged citizenry, with a stronger sense of belonging to their communities and their countries.

3. Improved voter turnout: If the voting age is lowered, there would be an increase in overall voter turnout. Young people are more inclined to vote if they are allowed to do so early on in their lives. This can lead to higher levels of civic engagement and hold elected officials more accountable for their actions.

4. Addressing the issues concerning youth: Lowering the voting age can help address the specific needs and concerns of young people, such as education, employment, and the environment. By giving them the chance to participate in the decision-making process, politicians will be more inclined to prioritize issues that matter to their younger constituents.

Example 2: The Voting Age Should be Lowered to 16

As we explore the benefits and reasons behind lowering the voting age, it is crucial to examine the various points of view that support the motion:

1. Maturity and understanding of the political system: It is often said that 16-year-olds lack the maturity and understanding required for making informed decisions when it comes to voting. However, research has shown that the cognitive abilities of adolescents are comparable to those of adults. Young people are just as capable of grasping political issues, making informed choices, and participating in the democratic process.

2. Inclusion and representation: Lowering the voting age promotes diversity, and contributes to creating a more inclusive democratic system. By giving young people the chance to vote, we are ensuring that the concerns of all members of society, regardless of age, are taken into account.

3. Fostering life-long voting habits: By allowing 16-year-olds to vote, we are encouraging them to develop lifelong habits of political engagement, fostering a sense of responsibility and civic duty from an early age.

4. Equality with other countries: Several countries around the world, including Brazil, Austria, and Argentina, have already lowered their voting age to 16. This move has resulted in increased voter turnout, engagement, and diversity among young voters.

Example 3: The Voting Age Should Not be Lowered to 16

There are also a number of reasons and arguments against the idea of lowering the voting age to 16. Opponents contend that:

1. Cognitive maturity and decision-making: 16-year-olds are still growing, both physically and mentally. Critics argue that young people may not yet possess the cognitive maturity to make reasoned decisions when it comes to voting, leading to uninformed choices that could negatively impact the democratic process.

2. The importance of life experience: The argument for life experience is that older individuals have had more exposure to the workforce, the economy, and social issues, which may enable them to make better decisions when voting. Critics argue that 16-year-olds lack this valuable perspective.

3. Age as a prerequisite for other rights and responsibilities: Lowering the voting age would create inconsistencies in the legal age limits for other activities, such as consuming alcohol, getting married, or entering the military. Critics argue that if 16-year-olds are not considered mature enough for these activities, then they should not be granted the right to vote.

4. Prioritizing civic education over lowering the voting age: Instead of lowering the voting age, opponents emphasize focusing on revamping civic education in schools. This would better prepare young people for political engagement when they are eligible to vote at 18.

Example 4: The Voting Age Should Not be Lowered to 16

Those arguing against lowering the voting age point to additional concerns, including:

1. Potential for manipulation: Some critics argue that younger voters may be more susceptible to manipulation by politicians or other external forces. They reason that this vulnerability could compromise the integrity of the democratic process.

2. Low voter turnout among young people: There is already a trend of low voter turnout among younger age groups. Critics of lowering the voting age feel that engaging 16- and 17-year-olds in the voting process may not lead to a significant increase in overall voter turnout.

3. Voting as a privilege and a responsibility: Voting is a privilege and a responsibility, and some believe that it should be limited to those who are more mature and have a greater understanding of the implications of their choices.

4. Risks of polarizing the electorate: Opponents argue that lowering the voting age could result in a more polarized electorate, with younger voters leaning towards more progressive policies and older voters tending to support conservative policies. This could create further divisions within society and contribute to political unrest.

Follow @JalingoHQ on twitter.

Related Topics

Top SectionsSee More

This forum does not have any topics.

Top Posters This Month (500 Credits)
(See More)