Guest Sign UpLoginNew PostSections ₦0What's Up?DownloadsShopChatToolsAdvertise
Join the Publishers' Program. Get paid for writing.
Recharge DSTV, GOTV, StarTimes, & PREPAID METERS on

Mr A

Example 1: Supporting Arguments: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished

In the past, capital punishment has been used as a means of deterrence and retribution across various societies. While this may have held some validity in earlier times, the modern world presents a multitude of reasons to reconsider this stance. This essay will examine the various factors that support the abolition of capital punishment, including the prospect of executing innocent people, the ineffectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent against crime, the high financial costs associated, and the inhumanity of the punishment itself.

First and foremost, the risk of executing innocent people presents an irrefutable argument against the death penalty. Throughout the years, numerous individuals sentenced to death have had their convictions overturned when new evidence emerged after their convictions. This suggests that the criminal justice system is not immune to making mistakes. The execution of someone wrongfully convicted of a crime not only robs them of their life, but it negates the possibility of obtaining justice for the victim of the crime.

Second, proponents of capital punishment often argue that the death penalty serves as an effective deterrent, dissuading individuals from committing heinous crimes for fear of facing the ultimate consequence. However, various statistical analyses have consistently shown that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime when compared to life imprisonment. For instance, a majority of states and countries that have abolished capital punishment have either experienced a decline or no increase in murder rates, suggesting that the threat of execution is not a significant factor in determining criminal behavior.

In addition to these ethical and pragmatic considerations, the financial costs of capital punishment cannot be ignored. The death penalty is significantly more expensive than life imprisonment, due to a variety of factors such as lengthy trials, repeated appeals, and extended incarceration in specialized death-row facilities. In many cases, taxpayers are burdened with these costs and must support a system that consumes resources that could be more effectively allocated to other areas, such as education and rehabilitation programs.

Lastly, the inhumanity of capital punishment is a core reason for its abolition. The death penalty, regardless of the method employed, represents a cruel and unusual punishment that goes against the principles of human rights and dignity. From ancient methods such as hanging and beheading to more recent innovations like the electric chair and lethal injection, these forms of execution often involve prolonged suffering for the individual facing the penalty. The deliberate taking of a person's life by a state-sanctioned authority raises questions about the morality of a society and whether it should resort to the same violence it aims to condemn.

Example 2: Supporting Arguments: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished

Capital punishment, a practice that dates back to ancient civilizations, is a highly controversial topic. This essay will continue to delve into the arguments for abolishing the death penalty, focusing on the arbitrariness and racial bias in capital sentencing, the irreversible nature of the punishment, the potential for reform, and the violation of international human rights standards.

One concerning aspect of the death penalty is the arbitrariness and racial bias in capital sentencing. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the race of both the defendant and the victim play a role in determining whether or not an individual will receive the death penalty. Specifically, individuals accused of killing white victims have been found to be more likely to receive a death sentence than those accused of killing black victims. This discrepancy raises serious concerns about the equal application of justice and impartiality within the legal system.

Another important consideration is the irreversible nature of capital punishment. Once a person is executed, there is no going back. If new evidence emerges after an execution, it is impossible to correct the injustice that has occurred. This permanence makes it imperative that our legal system is absolutely certain of a person's guilt before imposing such a severe sentence, and history has shown that wrongful convictions are an unfortunate reality.

Moreover, the death penalty neglects the potential for reform and rehabilitation. By focusing on retribution, the state fails to acknowledge the possibility that individuals who have committed crimes can change and reform their lives. Life imprisonment without parole, in contrast, allows for the possibility of psychological and emotional growth and transformation, while still ensuring that an individual remains removed from society.

Lastly, the death penalty is a violation of international human rights standards. Most developed countries have abolished the death penalty, and numerous international treaties prohibit its use. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which proclaims the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all human beings, recognizes the right to life as a fundamental human right. By executing individuals, states infringe upon this right and undermine the global progress towards universal human rights.

Example 3: Opposing Arguments: Capital Punishment Should Not Be Abolished

Despite the strong arguments for abolishing the death penalty, there are also arguments for its continued use. Proponents of capital punishment maintain that it serves as an effective deterrent to violent crime, upholds justice and retribution for victims and their families, and provides closure for society. This section will explore these opposing viewpoints, presenting the case for the maintenance of capital punishment.

The role of capital punishment as a deterrent to violent crime is a core argument for its continuation. Advocates assert that by demonstrating the consequences for heinous crimes, potential offenders will think twice before committing similar acts. The severity of the punishment serves as a powerful message that severe actions will lead to equally severe consequences, therefore protecting society as a whole by leading to reduced crime rates.

Another rationale for the continuation of capital punishment is the principle of retribution. Proponents argue that individuals who have committed violent crimes have forfeited their right to life, and that their victims deserve justice. In cases of particularly heinous offenses, the gravity of the crime may warrant the ultimate punishment, reflecting the moral outrage of society and providing a sense of justice for the victims and their families.

Additionally, capital punishment is thought to provide closure for both the victims' families and society. For those who have lost loved ones due to violent crime, the execution of the perpetrator can offer a sense of finality and a degree of comfort. As a society, the resolution of these cases can allow for collective healing and an affirmation of shared moral values.

Example 4: Opposing Arguments: Capital Punishment Should Not Be Abolished

As we continue to explore the opposing arguments for the retention of capital punishment, it is important to highlight the issues of constitutionality, public opinion, and the potential for reoffending by those sentenced to life imprisonment. These topics can provide meaningful perspectives on the necessity of the death penalty.

At its core, supporters of capital punishment assert that the practice is constitutionally permissible. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, does not explicitly rule out the death penalty. Throughout history, the Supreme Court has grappled with cases involving capital punishment, and while guidelines and regulations have evolved, it remains legally permissible under specific circumstances.

In addition, public opinion on the death penalty can play a role in its continuation. In countries like the United States, polls have illustrated that a significant portion of the population remains in favor of capital punishment. In some instances, support for the death penalty has been tied to political ideology and the belief that it deters criminal behavior. As long as there is a substantial portion of the population that supports capital punishment, policymakers may feel a responsibility to represent these views, leading to the upholding of the practice.

Finally, concerns about reoffending are an important component in the argument to maintain capital punishment. In some cases, those sentenced to life imprisonment may eventually be released on parole, raising concerns about the potential for recidivism. The death penalty, in contrast, eliminates the chance of a convicted murderer repeating their offense, thereby ensuring the safety and security of communities.

As illustrated, the complex and controversial nature of capital punishment means that there are multiple perspectives on whether it should be abolished or maintained. Understanding these diverse viewpoints allows for a more comprehensive and nuanced evaluation of this significant issue.

Follow @JalingoHQ on twitter.

Related Topics

Top SectionsSee More

This forum does not have any topics.

Top Posters This Month (500 Credits)
(See More)